Background
The case concerned the statutory time within which the Uganda Revenue Authority (URA) is required to make and serve an objection decision following a taxpayer’s objection to a tax assessment.Munyanga Development Limited had lodged an objection but URA did not serve an objection decision within the statutory 90-day period. Upon expiry of the period, the taxpayer exercised its statutory right to elect to treat the objection as allowed.
URA subsequently issued an objection decision and sought to maintain the tax assessment. The taxpayer challenged the validity of URA’s subsequent decision before the Tax Appeals Tribunal.
Issue
The central question was whether URA retained jurisdiction to issue an objection decision after the statutory 90-day period had expired and the taxpayer had validly elected to treat its objection as allowed.
Decision
The Tribunal found in favour of the taxpayer. It held that once the statutory period had expired without an objection decision being served, a valid election by the taxpayer to treat the objection as allowed took effect automatically.
Consequently, URA became functus officio and had no further jurisdiction to issue an objection decision in respect of the objection. The subsequent decision by URA was therefore void.
The Tribunal also rejected the argument that the general rules of computation under the Interpretation Act could be used to extend the specific statutory timeline governing tax objections.
Significance
The decision is an important reminder that statutory tax timelines are not merely procedural formalities. They impose obligations on both taxpayers and the revenue authority.
For taxpayers, the case demonstrates the importance of closely monitoring the 90-day objection period and taking advantage of the statutory remedies available when URA fails to act within time.
For URA, the decision reinforces that failure to comply with mandatory statutory timelines may result in the loss of jurisdiction to make a subsequent objection decision.
Key takeaway:
Once the statutory conditions for an election to treat an objection as allowed are satisfied, the taxpayer’s election takes effect by operation of law; URA cannot subsequently revive the matter by issuing a late objection decision.
Leave a Reply